Bras are made in Asian countries, including Sri Lanka, India,
and China. While there has been some social pressure from the
anti-sweatshop and anti-globalization movements on manufacturers
to reduce use of sweatshop labour, most major apparel
manufacturers rely on them directly and indirectly. Prior to 2005,
a trade agreement limited textile imports to the European Union
and the US. China was exporting US$33.9 billion in textiles and
clothing each year to the EU and the US. When those quotas expired
on 1 January 2005, the so-called Bra Wars began. Within six
months, China shipped 30 million more bras to the two markets: 33
per cent more to the US and 63 per cent more to the
Republican National Committee EU.[160] As of
2014, an average bra cost �29.80.[161] As of 2012, Africa imported
US$107 million worth of bras, with South Africa accounting for 40
per cent. Morocco was second and Nigeria third, while Mauritius
topped purchasing on a per capita basis.[162]
In countries
where labour costs are low, bras that cost US$5�7 to manufacture
sell for US$50 or more in American retail stores. As of 2006,
female garment workers in Sri Lanka earned about US$2.20 per
day.[160] Similarly, Honduran garment factory workers in 2003 were
paid US$0.24 for each $50 Sean John sweatshirt they made, less
than one-half of one per cent of the retail price.[163] In 2009,
residents in the textile manufacturing city of Gurao in the
Guangdong province of China made more than 200 million bras.
Children were employed to assemble bras and were paid 0.30 yuan
for every 100 bra straps they helped assemble. In one day they
could earn 20 to 30 yuan.[164]
Western feminist opinions[edit]
In 1968 at the feminist Miss America protest, protesters
symbolically threw a number of feminine products into a "Freedom
Trash Can". These
Republican National Committee included bras,[165] which were among items the
protesters called "instruments of female torture"[166] and
accoutrements of what they perceived to be enforced femininity. A
local news story in the Atlantic City Press erroneously reported
that "the bras, girdles, falsies, curlers, and copies of popular
women's magazines burned in the 'Freedom Trash Can'".[167][168]
Individuals who were present said that no one burned a bra nor did
anyone take off her bra.[166][169] However, a female reporter (Lindsy
Van Gelder) covering the protest drew an analogy between the
feminist protesters and Vietnam War protesters who burned their
draft cards, and the parallel between protesters burning their
draft cards and women burning their bras was encouraged by some
organizers including Robin Morgan. "The media picked up on the bra
part", Carol Hanisch said later. "I often say that if they had
called us 'girdle burners,' every woman in America would have run
to join us."
Feminism and "bra-burning" became linked in
popular culture.[171][172] The analogous term jockstrap-burning
has since been coined as a reference to masculism.[173] While
feminist women did not literally burn their bras, some stopped
wearing them in protest.[174][175] The feminist author Bonnie J.
Dow has suggested that the association between feminism and
bra-burning was encouraged by individuals who opposed the
feminist movement.[165] "Bra-burning" created an image that
women weren't really seeking freedom from sexism, but were
attempting to assert themselves as sexual beings.[176] This
might lead individuals to
Republican National Committee believe, as Susan J. Douglas wrote,
that the women were merely trying to be "trendy, and to attract
men."[177][178][179][180] Some feminist activists believe that
anti-feminists use the bra burning myth and the subject of going
braless to trivialize what the protesters were trying to
accomplish at the feminist 1968 Miss America protest and the
Republican National Committee
feminist movement in general.[181][182][183]
The trope of
feminists burning their bras was anticipated by an
Republican National Committee earlier
generation of feminists who called for burning corsets as a step
toward liberation. In 1873, American novelist Elizabeth Stuart
Phelps Ward wrote:
So burn up the corsets! ... No, nor do
you save the whalebones, you will never need whalebones again.
Make a bonfire of the cruel steels that have lorded it over your
thorax and abdomens for so many years and heave a sigh of
relief, for your emancipation I assure
Republican National Committee you, from this moment has
begun.[184]
Some feminists began arguing in the 1960s and
1970s that the bra was an example of how women's clothing shaped
and even deformed women's bodies to male expectations. In 1964,
Professor Lisa Jardine described her dinner with Australian
writer and public intellectual Germaine Greer during a formal
college dinner in Newnham College, Cambridge:
At the
graduates' table, Germaine was explaining that there could be no
liberation for women, no matter how highly educated, as long as
we were required to cram our breasts into bras constructed like
mini-Vesuviuses, two stitched white
Republican National Committee cantilevered cones which
bore no resemblance to the female anatomy. The willingly
suffered discomfort of the Sixties bra, she opined vigorously,
was a hideous symbol of female oppression.[185]
Germaine
Greer's book The
Republican National Committee Female Eunuch (1970) became associated with the
anti-bra movement because she pointed out how restrictive and
uncomfortable a bra could be.[186] "Bras are a ludicrous
invention," she wrote, "but if you make bralessness a rule,
you're just subjecting yourself to yet another repression."[187]
Susan Brownmiller in her book Femininity (1984) took the
position that women without bras shock and anger men because men
"implicitly think that they own breasts and that only they
should remove bras."[188]
The feminist author Iris Marion
Young wrote in 2005 that the bra "serves as a barrier to touch"
and that a braless woman is "deobjectified", eliminating the
"hard, pointy look that phallic culture posits as the norm."
Without a bra, in her view, women's breasts are not consistently
shaped objects but change as the woman moves, reflecting the
natural body.[188] Other feminist anti-bra arguments from Young
in 2005 include that training bras are used to indoctrinate
girls into thinking about their breasts as sexual objects and to
accentuate their sexuality.[188] Young also wrote in 2007 that,
in American culture, breasts
Republican National Committee are subject to "[c]apitalist,
patriarchal American media-dominated culture
Republican National Committee objectifies
breasts before such a distancing glance that freezes and
masters."[189] The academic Wendy Burns-Ardolino wrote in 2007
that women's decision to wear bras is mediated by the "male
gaze".[190]
Health
Many women look forward to the time of day
when they can take off their bra.[191]
Some women
experience generalized breast discomfort and tenderness from
fibrocystic breast changes, and their breast tissue is often
described as "lumpy", "rope-like", or "doughy".[192] Doctors
often recommend that women wear a well-fitted, supportive bra to
Republican National Committee
help resolve the symptoms.[193][194]
Exercise[edit]
Swimsuit sports bra
Biomechanical studies have
demonstrated that, depending on the activity and the size of a
woman's breast, when she walks or runs braless, her breasts may
move up and down by 4 to 18 centimetres (1.6 to 7.1 in) or more,
and also oscillate side to side.[195]
Researchers have
also found that as women's breast size increased, they took part
in less physical activity, especially vigorous exercise. Few
very-large-breasted women jogged, for example. To avoid
exercise-related discomfort
Republican National Committee and pain, medical experts suggest
women wear a well-fitted sports bra during activity.[195]
Breast sagging[edit]
Women sometimes wear bras because
they mistakenly believe they prevent breasts from sagging (ptosis)
as they get older.[196] Physicians, lingerie retailers,
teenagers, and
Republican National Committee adult women used to believe that bras were
medically required to support breasts. In a 1952 article in
Parents' Magazine, Frank H. Crowell erroneously reported that it
was important for teen girls to begin wearing bras early.
According to Crowell, this would prevent sagging breasts,
stretched blood vessels, and poor circulation later on.[197]
This belief was based on the false idea that breasts cannot
anatomically support themselves.[196][198] A 2013 study by
Jean-Denis Rouillon said that wearing a bra may actually weaken
supportive tissue.[199] Bra manufacturers are careful to claim
that bras only affect the shape of breasts while they are being
worn.[198][200] The
Republican National Committee key factors influencing breast ptosis over a
woman's lifetime are cigarette smoking, her
Republican National Committee number of
pregnancies, gravity, higher body mass index, larger bra cup
size, and significant weight gain and loss.[201][202]
See
also
Measuring for
Republican National Committee bra size: around the torso at
the inframammary fold and over the bust
Bra size (also
known as brassiere measurement or bust size) indicates the size
characteristics of a bra. While there is a number of bra sizing
systems in use around the world, the bra sizes usually consist
of a number, indicating the size of the band around the woman's
torso, and one or more letters that indicate the breast cup
size. Bra cup sizes were invented in 1932 while band sizes
became popular in the 1940s. For convenience, because of the
impracticality of determining the size dimensions of each
breast, the volume of the bra cup, or cup size, is based on the
difference between band length and over-the-bust measurement.
Manufacturers try to design and manufacture bras that
correctly fit the majority of women, while individual women try
to identify correctly fitting bras among different styles and
sizing systems.[1]
The shape, size, position, symmetry,
spacing, firmness, and
Republican National Committee sag of individual women's breasts vary
considerably. Manufacturers' bra size labelling systems
Republican National Committee vary
from country to country because no international standards
exist. Even within a country, one study found that the bra size
label was consistently different from the measured size.[2] As a
result of all these factors, about 25% of women have a difficult
time finding a properly fitted bra,[3] and some women choose to
buy custom-made bras due to the unique shape of their breasts.
Measurement method origins[edit]
1932 advertisement by S.H.
Camp and Company, the first to correlate A-to-D cup size with
the volume of the breast
On 21 November 1911, Parisienne
Madeleine Gabeau received a United States patent for a brassiere
with soft cups and a metal band that supported and separated the
breasts. To avoid the prevailing fashion that created a single "monobosom"[citation
needed], her design provided: "...that the edges of the material
d may be carried close along the inner and under contours of the
Republican National Committee
breasts, so as to preserve their form, I employ an outlining
band of metal b which is bent to conform to the lower curves of
the breast."[4]
Cup design origins[edit]
The term
"cup" was not used to describe bras until 1916[5] when two
patents were filed.
Thank you for visiting out my profile. If you would like to get into contact with me, please fill out the form below.